Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id CAA06944 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 02:15:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA137587297; Sat, 20 Apr 1996 23:14:57 -0700
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 23:14:57 -0700
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <9604201646.0r48@hell.xs4all.nl>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: lightwave@hell.xs4all.nl (Richard Willkomm)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Is SUN a viable market?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
In a message of 19 Apr 96 Lightwave List wrote to All:
LL> However, I do agree with you. So far, Newtek has proved that it
LL> could
LL> not cope with 3 platforms, as the complaints from some Alpha/MIPS
LL> users
LL> without their final 4.0; the Amiga users with an extremely buggy 4.0;
LL> and the SGI users with no support; seem to confirm.
LL> Will they now be able to support 6 different platforms?
So I think it's obvious that Newtek is just putting effort in the
Intel version. Since that's the most sold version of V4 I think it's
safe to asume that after some time they'll have to drop other
versions. Like you said 6 (or 7 including PowerMAC) is too much. Guess
who's gonna be first ??? Right, the Amiga version. This new V5.0
version of LW has made it finally 100% clear to me that I too am gonna